Retail Fixed Line Competition: 2012

Participation in the Government’s Ultra Fast Broadband program means change for Telecom New Zealand, and change for the industry as a whole. Once separated, the industry loses a dominant, vertically integrated retail carrier and moves to a market structure where all telecommunications products will be built from components offered by separate commercial entities.

The diagram below shows transit, national backbone, and last mile options available for companies participating in a post-separation world. A competitive retail provider such as Snap will require a relationship with a transit provider, a national backbone provider, and a last mile provider in each market they want to compete in. Alternatively they could approach a company such as TelstraClear for integrated National Backbone + Last Mile products, or Telecom for integrated National Backbone + International Transit products. TelstraClear, with their strong buying power on Southern Cross Cable, and extensive Wellington and Christchurch HFC networks, remains the only provider with a near vertical approach to some markets.

NZ Wholesale Market 2012. By 2015 two new International Transit providers should be available.

This new regime should increase competition – especially in larger markets. The table below shows that eight of the top ten larges markets in New Zealand will be serviced by at least three national backbone providers and three last mile providers. In the Auckland CBD, four metro fibre networks are available today. Wellington and Christchurch have three extensive metro fibre networks each. Competition does tail off steeply in markets of fewer than 50,000 people.

In the table below, NB = National Backbone; LM= Last Mile; TNZ = Telecom New Zealand (Telecom 2); FX = FX Networks; CH2 = Chorus 2; TCL = Telstra Clear; and ALT = Alternative Provider, such as a lines-company fronted local fibre company.

[iframe http://telco2.co.nz/competition.html 100% 800px]

With the dominant retail player about to be on an even footing with competitors when purchasing last-mile services, in 2012 you should expect retail products to change, and strong competition to emerge – especially in larger markets.

3 thoughts on “Retail Fixed Line Competition: 2012

  1. It’s going to be very interesting to see where they draw the line on what goes into Chorus2 and what stays with Telecom.

    Hopefully UFB will lead to Telecom Retail and Telstraclear marketshare dropping enough that they re-engage with domestic peering rather than using market power to extract interconnection revenue from other ISP’s and hosting providers.

    Like

    • Hi James, I’ve added Palmerston North. Can’t wait to see some details of the network on the web. As for Invercargill – I’ll believe it when I see it. Cheers…

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s